Cases 1 - 10 of 1,783
WILLIAMS v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
USA and TEXAS, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
MCCANTS v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
TRAVUS MCCANTS
Defendant:
CHUM HARRISON, FNU WOODARD, FNU NEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. NOYES EDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Defendant:
OFFICER #1 J.P. NOYES EDGE and OFFICER #2 T.H. REECE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
SUSAN WILSON
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVIDSON COUNTY, RICHIE T. SIMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RENZI v. NAPHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RENZI
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR., BRIAN L. GILROY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
BEVERLEY v. BREEZE
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
JAMES BEVERLEY
Defendant:
DURHAM CO and WILLIAM BREEZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNING v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
PIERRE BROWNING
Defendant:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY and DAVID LANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
IRA KNIGHT and REGIONAL DIRECTOR CENTRAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
