Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 91 - 100 of 106
SIMMONS v. ATKINSON
as 1:2010cv00975
Plaintiff: WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant: GRAHAM ATKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM et al v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00830
Plaintiff: JEFFREY CORTEZ GRAHAM
Defendant: WAFFLE HOUSE, INC., FREEWAY FOODS OF GREENSBORO, INC. , FREEWAY FOODS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
WILLIAMS v. MULLEN et al
as 1:2010cv00834
Plaintiff: PERCY ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: GRAHAM C. MULLEN and WILLIAM B. TRAXLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00501
Plaintiff: PERCY ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: LEWIS O. SMITH, ROBERT P. JOHNSTON, STAPLES HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. USA
as 1:2010cv00050
Petitioner: CARL KOTAY GRAHAM
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GRAHAM v. USA
as 1:2009cv00965
Plaintiff: CARL KOTAY GRAHAM
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
GRAHAM v. USA
as 1:2009cv00958
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: CARL KOTAY GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GRAHAM v. USA
as 1:2009cv00889
Plaintiff: CARL KOTAY GRAHAM
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
GRAHAM v. USA
as 1:2009cv00795
Plaintiff: CARL KOTAY GRAHAM
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
GAINES MOTOR LINES, INC., et al v. KLAUSSNER FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00302
Plaintiff: GAINES MOTOR LINES, INC., B.A.H. EXPRESS, INC., FREIGHTMASTER, INC. and others
Defendant: KLAUSSNER FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?