Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 3:2013cv00467
Petitioner:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Respondent:
Rick Ryan Pegram , Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Danielson v. Human et al
as 3:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
Aaron Keven Danielson
Defendant:
Jan Petrus Human, Albertus Johannes Humjan, H-Power Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Taidoc Technology Corp. v. OK Biotech Co. Ltd
as 3:2012cv00654
Plaintiff:
Taidoc Technology Corporation
Defendant:
OK Biotech Co. Ltd. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Doe v. Roe
as 3:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lightner v. Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tonya M. Lightner
Defendant:
Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc., Arvell Mac and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Sims Enterprises, LLC v. The Carpenter Company et al
as 5:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Robert Sims Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
The Carpenter Company, Domfoam International, Inc., Flexible Foam Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Robert Sims Enterprises, LLC v. The Carpenter Company et al
as 3:2010cv00438
Plaintiff:
Robert Sims Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
The Carpenter Company, Domfoam International, Inc., Flexible Foam Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ayers v. Professional Recovery Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Michelle Ayers
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Services, Inc., John Doe and Robert Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe v. Roe
as 3:2010mc05000
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
