Cases 121 - 130 of 165
Madden v. Adcock, et al
as 2:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
SGT Adcock, Corporal Foster, Nurse Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Devion Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Nottoway Correctional Center, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Piedmont Regional Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail, Jome Gornot, Donald Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pulley v. Martin et al
as 2:2017cv00234
Plaintiff:
Craig L. Pulley
Defendant:
Deputy Martin, Major Spruill and Captain Crooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Johnson
as 2:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Eugene Franklin Stanley, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Anthony D. Johnson, Lieutenant Portrell Temple, Officer Anthony L. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Farmville City et al
as 3:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Farmville City, Prince Edwards County, Peidmont Reginonal Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Hampton City Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
Antoine Beasley
Defendant:
Hampton City Jail and Captain Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Grims et al
as 2:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Phil Grims, Major Lorri Rohme, Captain Huston Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Godall et al
as 2:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dedric Morris
Defendant:
Captain Godall, Sgt. Robinson and Naphcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Bowen et al
as 1:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Thorne
Defendant:
Ms. Bowen, Ms. L. Smith, Mrs. Sgt. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
