Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shearin v. Chief Medical Director of VA D.O.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Defendant:
Chief Medical Director of VA D.O.C., Chief Physician of VA D.O.C., Dr. Militana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Geo Secure Services, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Supervising Nurse, Geo Secure Services, LLC, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Kincaid et al
as 1:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Lieutenant Colonel Mark Sites, Lieutenant Colonel Kevin Andarayese, 1st Lt. Hovannhyan and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos A-Lail Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Garnett et al
as 2:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
William S. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
James Garnett, Donald Hunter, Piedmont Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Director Virginia, D.O.C et al
as 1:2016cv00901
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Green
Defendant:
Director Virginia, D.O.C, Warden & Medical Director of Greensville Correctional Ctr and Attorney General of State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Newscome et al
as 1:2014cv01257
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Green
Defendant:
Jeffery Newscome, Bonkye Medical Director, Riverside Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Medical Director, Petersburg Med.
as 3:2013cv00636
Plaintiff:
Grady E. Mays
Defendant:
Medical Director, Petersburg Med.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tuck v. Director of Medical Services et al
as 1:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Clyde Tuck
Defendant:
Director of Medical Services and Medical Director for DWCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benavidez v. Stansberry et al
as 1:2007cv00891
Plaintiff:
Milton Alvarado Benavidez
Defendant:
Patricia Stansberry, U.S. Marshall Service, Youngstown Receptional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
