Cases 41 - 49 of 49
E. A. Hawse Health Center et al v. Bureau for Medical Services, Department of Health and Human Resources, State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
E. A. Hawse Health Center , Cabin Creek Health Systems , FamilyCare HealthCenter and others
Defendant:
Bureau for Medical Services, Department of Health and Human Resources, State of West Virginia and Nancy Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Parker v. Stevens Correctional Center et al
as 1:2008cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Stevens Correctional Center, Brewster, Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv00078
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Atkins
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Casey v. Whimbish et al
as 5:2008cv01441
Plaintiff:
Adam Nicholas Casey
Defendant:
Whimbish, Underwood, Unknown Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Stevens Correctional Center et al
as 2:2008cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Stevens Correctional Center, Brewster, Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv00320
Plaintiff:
Dora Atkins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sumpter v. McKay, et al
as 2:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Travis Sumpter
Defendant:
John McKay, David Farmer, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Short v. Prime Care Medical-WV et al
as 2:2006cv00933
Plaintiff:
Harvey Patrick Short
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical-WV, Prime Care Medical-WV, Fred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
