Cases 1 - 4 of 4
The County Commissiion of Fayette County, WV v. National Grid NE Holdings 2 LLC
as 24-1590
Defendant:
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, a New Hampshire coporation, solely to the extent of coverage available pursuant to liability insurance policies issued by it expressly providing coverage to Eastern Gas and Fuel Associates or any of its subsidiaries, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation successor in interest to, PARDEE AND CURTAIN REALTY LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company qualified to do business in West Virginia and others
Cross-Defendant:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of North America, and as successor to CIGNA Specialty Insurance Company formerly known as California Union Insurance Company, FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CILIBERTI, Esq, Fayette County Prosecuting Attorney and FAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION, a political subdivision of the State of West Virginia
Ronnie Adams v. Service Employees Intl
as 13-2107
Petitioner:
RONNIE W. ADAMS
Respondent:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
L-3 Communications Corporation v. DOWCP
as 10-2335
Petitioner:
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS and MICHEL SCHBOT
L-3 Communications et al v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs et al
as 2:2010cv00592
Plaintiff:
L-3 Communications and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs and Michel Schbot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
