Cases 21 - 30 of 10,914
Jordan v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jordan
Defendant:
John Doe, Niyombi Marshall, Malik Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lankford v. McCombs et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Derek Lankford
Defendant:
Officer McCombs, Sergeant Doe and Newport News Jail Magistrate Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Lankford v. Schraudt et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derek Lankford
Defendant:
Jennifer Schraudt and Newport News Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ali v. Schweiner et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Kazim Ali
Defendant:
Carl Schweiner, Carrie Poulin, Robert Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hawkins v. Allen et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
George Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Robin Allen and Dr. Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. City of Roanoke, Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Doris E. Tucker
Defendant:
City of Roanoke, Virginia and U.S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Raynor v. The United States et al
as 2:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ryan J. Raynor
Defendant:
The United States and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
