Cases 41 - 50 of 235
Bellamy v. Cross et al
as 5:2019cv02650
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections Medical Division and Stephen Cross
Plaintiff:
Donald Bellamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingle v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2019cv02426
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Timothy Donald Dingle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baumann v. McFadden et al
as 8:2019cv01244
Plaintiff:
Judy Baumann
Defendant:
Tyrone Heyward, Timothy Gilmore, Warden Joseph McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babb v. United States of America
as 0:2019cv00487
Plaintiff:
Donald Babb
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
English v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00246
Plaintiff:
Roderick English, Ralph K. and Ralph K. Tripp Anderson
Defendant:
US Marshal Justice Marshal Blackmun, Attorney General Donald Zelenka, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Major Parrish, Associate Warden Tonya James, Warden Donald Beckwith and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Beckwith
as 2:2018cv03012
Respondent:
Donald Beckwith
Petitioner:
James Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fender v. USA
as 2:2018cv02594
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Travis Donald Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Franklin v. Reynolds et al
as 6:2018cv02568
Defendant:
Circuit 8 Solicitors, Attorneys and Staff, Donald Reynolds, Matthew Veil and others
Plaintiff:
Dumarcus Antonio Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunsberger v. Myers et al
as 8:2018cv02548
Plaintiff:
Alexander Louis Hunsberger
Defendant:
Randy B Duran, Frank Young, Rich Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
