Cases 1 - 5 of 5
The United States for the Use and Benefit of Precision Walls, Inc. et al v. Carothers Construction, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
The United States for the Use and Benefit of Precision Walls, Inc. and Precision Walls, Inc.
Defendant:
Carothers Construction, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Carothers Construction, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
The United States for the Use and Benefit of Precision Walls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use of WALL TO WALL PLASTERING, LTD. v. W. M. Jordan Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00506
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use of WALL TO WALL PLASTERING, LTD.
Defendant:
W. M. Jordan Company, Inc. and Rin-Buhr Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
PRECISION WALLS, INC. v. IKHANA, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
PRECISION WALLS, INC.
Defendant:
IKHANA, LLC and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
United States of America for the use and benefit of Precision Walls, Inc. v. W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company et al
as 7:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Precision Walls, Inc.
Defendant:
W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company , Caddell Construction Co., Inc. , Caddell Yates Joint Venture and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Quality Resources, Inc. et al v. Precision Walls, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00670
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Quality Resources, Inc. and Quality Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
Precision Walls, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
