Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund v. Kramer et al
as 8:2021cv01595
Defendant:
George A. Joulwan, Kathryn C Zoon, Richard S. Lindahl and others
Plaintiff:
Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund v. McInerney et al
as 3:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Thomas J. McInerney, William H. Bolinder, Gaylord Kent Conrad and others
Petitioner:
David Pinkoski, Richard L. Salberg and Martin Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Salberg v. McInerney et al
as 3:2015cv00517
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Salberg
Defendant:
Thomas J. McInerney, Michael P. Klein, Michael D. Frazier and others
Petitioner:
Martin Cohen and International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Cohen v. McInerney et al
as 3:2015cv00504
Plaintiff:
Martin Cohen
Defendant:
Thomas J. McInerney, Martin P. Klein, William H. Bolinder and others
Petitioner:
David Pinkoski and International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Pinkoski v. McInerney et al
as 3:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
David Pinkoski
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Martin Cohen, Richard L. Salberg and International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Thomas J. McInerney, Martin P. Klein, William H. Bolinder and others
Consolidated Defendant:
KPMG LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02667
Defendant:
Constellation Energy Group, Inc., Mayo A. Shattuck, Douglas L. Becker and others
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
