Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cheryl Pauley v. Brian Noran
as 22-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHERYL A. PAULEY, on behalf of deceased biological son Tavon Pauley, and others next-of-kin, interested, and similarly situated, and friend of this court, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN NORAN, Virginia Secretary of Public Safety, subordinates, subsidiaries, et al., HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC's Director, Subordinates, Subsidiaries, et al. and DR. STEVE HERRICK, VDOC Offender Health Services Director, Subordinates, and medical units levels 1 to 6 subsidiaries, et al.
Thomas A. Murray v. Accomack County Health Dept
as 14-1134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS A. MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Keitz v. Unnamed Sponsor
as 12-1640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES KEITZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED SPONSORS OF COCAINE RESEARCH STUDY, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER and others
Charles Dickerson v. TLC The Laser Eye Center
as 12-1117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BENJAMIN DICKERSON, a/k/a Ben, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOLLMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TLC THE LASER EYE CENTER INSTITUTE, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER CAROLINA, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER MADISON, INC. and others
Michael Keitz v. Sponsors of Cocaine Research
as 11-2016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES KEITZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED SPONSORS OF COCAINE RESEARCH STUDY, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER and others
Keitz v. Unnamed Sponsors of Cocaine Research Study et al
as 3:2011cv00054
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, UVA Center for Addiction Research, University of Virginia and Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Keitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
