General Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Farmer v. Hunt et al
as 5:2016hc02208
Petitioner: Matthew Walter Farmer
Respondent: Nora Hunt and Frank L. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOLDSTON v. PERRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00758
Petitioner: WALTER GOLDSTON
Respondent: FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMMONS v. BOWMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00059
Petitioner: WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Respondent: RICKY BOWMAN and TIM WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEADEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00700
Petitioner: WALTER DORSETT HEADEN, III
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henriquez v. Wilson
as 5:2013hc02054
Petitioner: Walter R. Henriquez
Respondent: Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEADEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00124
Petitioner: WALTER DORSETT HEADEN, JR.
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gladden v. Tripp et al
as 5:2013hc02036
Petitioner: Walter R. Gladden
Respondent: Brick Tripp and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HEADEN-EL v. KELLER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00590
Petitioner: WALTER D. HEADEN-EL
Respondent: ALLVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gladden v. Miner
as 5:2011hc02120
Petitioner: Walter R. Gladden
Respondent: Jonathan C. Miner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NOOE v. NEELY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00288
Petitioner: WALTER CLEVELAND NOOE
Respondent: R. NEELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?