Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Jeffrey Pleasant v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, II
as 14-6238
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY A. PLEASANT
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, Attorney General of the State of Virginia and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Retalic v. The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
as 1:2013cv00536
Petitioner:
Robert E. Retalic
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. State of Virginia et al
as 7:2012cv00338
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark and State of Virginia
Petitioner:
Rayfel Andre Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Attorney General of the State of Virginia et al
as 3:2012cv00531
Petitioner:
Ricky Glendall Davis
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Virginia and Donald E. Jeffrey, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Islam v. The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
as 1:2012cv00721
Petitioner:
Md. Tajul Islam
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. The State of Virginia
as 1:2011cv01216
Petitioner:
Dontae Jones
Respondent:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
North v. Prosecutors Office et al
as 1:2011cv01164
Petitioner:
Kevin North
Respondent:
Prosecutors Office and State Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. State of Virginia
as 1:2011cv00865
Petitioner:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amerson v. State of Virginia et al
as 1:2011cv00474
Petitioner:
Mwando Amerson
Respondent:
State of Virginia and George M. Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall-El v. City of Norfolk Police et al
as 2:2011cv00048
Petitioner:
William Salaam Hall-El
Respondent:
City of Norfolk Police, State of Virginia, Norfolk Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
