Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Andrew White v. Warden McCormick Correctional
as 13-7164
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW RAY WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and ALAN WILSON
Anthony Johnson v. Leroy Cartledge
as 13-6931
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY JESUS JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE
Respondent:
ATTY GEN ALAN WILSON and THE STATE
Jones v. Wilson et al
as 5:2013cv00720
Petitioner:
Dwight Jones
Respondent:
Alan Wilson and Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Wilson et al
as 9:2013cv00697
Petitioner:
Billy Ray Henson
Respondent:
Alan Wilson and Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Riley et al
as 4:2012cv03259
Petitioner:
Steven A Robinson
Respondent:
Tim Riley and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomlin v. Cohen et al
as 9:2012cv03258
Petitioner:
George Lee Tomlin
Respondent:
Levern Cohen and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobarruvias v. Wilson et al
as 4:2012cv03096
Petitioner:
Jose Luna Cobarruvias
Respondent:
Alan Wilson and Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zhan v. Wilson et al
as 8:2012cv03052
Petitioner:
Hao Qing Zhan
Respondent:
Alan Wilson and Larry Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nall v. Cartledge
as 6:2012cv02424
Petitioner:
Emmett Ray Nall
Respondent:
Warden Cartledge and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benjamin v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 9:2012cv02378
Petitioner:
Franklin A Benjamin
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of, Alan Wilson and Warden McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
