Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Jones v. Calvery County-State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Danny Jones
Respondent:
Calvery County-State of Maryland, William Bailey and Attorney General of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barlow v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv03013
Petitioner:
Joshua Barlow
Respondent:
Paige C. Jones and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivanov v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv02903
Petitioner:
Ivanov S. Patel and Pavel S. Ivanov
Respondent:
Paige C. Jones and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Frost et al
as 8:2022cv01319
Petitioner:
Brandon Jones
Respondent:
Brian Frost and Executive Director Kevin P. Guistwite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2021cv02853
Petitioner:
Jerry Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv03456
Respondent:
Warden, Maryland Attorney General and Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Clyde Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Warden of B.C.B.I.C et al
as 1:2020cv01189
Respondent:
Christiana Reynolds, Robert Cucchiaro, Baltimore City Police Dept. Central Division and others
Petitioner:
Ray M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv00413
Petitioner:
Stephen Barry Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Brian Frosh and Richard Dovey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones-EL v. Bishop
as 8:2017cv03611
Petitioner:
Wendall Ernest Jones-EL
Respondent:
Frank Bishop and Attorney General of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Graham et al
as 1:2017cv03523
Petitioner:
LeTory Antyan Jones
Respondent:
Richard Graham and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
