Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Ambrose v. State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Ambrose, Jr.
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Zachery L. Nine, Christopher C. Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Jones et al
as 2:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Rick Jones, Matt Clemons and MOCC State Shope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Jones et al
as 2:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Rick Jones, Matt Clemons, MOCC State Shope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. MOCC State Shope et al
as 2:2011cv00897
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
MOCC State Shope, Rick Jones and Matthew Clemas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ray Stewart
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Stevens Correctional Center, Dennis Dingus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00387
Petitioner:
Cassie McKenzie
Respondent:
United States of America, Myron L. Batts, Teresa Arisman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Caudill et al
as 2:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Andre' Wilson
Defendant:
Steve Caudill , Terry Coleman , David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2009cv01545
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Driver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
