Cases 61 - 70 of 42,966
Moultrie v. Robinson
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Jones
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fogel v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brian Fogel
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, Warden Jeffrey Artrip, Assistant Warden J.H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leroy Floyd
Defendant:
Happy Smith, Rick White, P. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. VADOC Publication Review Committee
as 7:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
VADOC Publication Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Stephen et al
as 8:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Milton Williams
Defendant:
Bryson Stephen, Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, Monise A. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Craig Johnson and Sgt. E.C. Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
