Cases 1 - 10 of 13
John Miller v. South Carolina Department
as 09-7751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALAN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PATRICIA COOK and others
Miller v. York County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2009cv02473
Plaintiff:
John Alan Miller
Defendant:
York County Public Defenders Office, Mindi Inski and Gary Lamel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
John Miller v. Larry Davis
as 09-6971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALAN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY DAVIS, c-o S C Dept of Probation Parole and Pardon Services
John Miller v. Rock Hill City Police Departme
as 09-6863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALAN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCK HILL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, c-o Rock Hill Law Enforcement Center
Miller v. Davis
as 2:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
John Alan Miller
Defendant:
Larry Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Miller v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
as 2:2009cv00967
Plaintiff:
John Alan Miller
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services and Larry Davis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Rock Hill Police Department
as 2:2009cv00737
Plaintiff:
John Alan Miller
Defendant:
Rock Hill Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Miller v. Vocational Rehabilitation Work
as 09-6406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALAN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION WORKSHOP, INCORPORATED and MS. WILLIAMS
John Miller v. SC Department of Probation
as 09-6251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALAN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES
John Miller v. York County Public Defenders O
as 09-6237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALAN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
YORK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.