Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brooks v. Patterson et al
as 9:2015cv04611
Plaintiff:
Altony Brooks
Defendant:
Sharon Patterson , S Roberson , Annie McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaheen Cabbagestalk v. Deputy Warden Willie Davi
as 14-6586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAHEEN CABBAGESTALK
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE DAVIS, MS. SMITH, ANGELA SMITH and others
Cabbagestalk v. Davis et al
as 5:2013cv03387
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Willie Davis, Ms Smith, Angela Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angelo Ham v. Dennis Patterson
as 12-6991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS PATTERSON, ANTHONY J. PADULA, JAMES DEAN and others
Spears v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv03175
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Spears, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon E Ozmint, Anthony Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Patterson et al
as 6:2011cv00853
Defendant:
Dennis Patterson, Anthony J Padula, James C Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Epps
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Sharon Patterson, Ann Hallmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker Camp v. Cedric June
as 10-7380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALKER CAMP
Defendant - Appellee:
CEDRIC JUNE, Lieutenant, SHARON PATTERSON, ANTHONY PADULA, Warden and others
Thompson v. Patterson et al
as 9:2010cv02381
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rowan Thompson
Defendant:
Sharon Patterson and Anthony Padula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penza v. Patterson et al
as 8:2010cv02361
Plaintiff:
John L Penza
Defendant:
Sharon Patterson and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
