Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. King et al
as 5:2023ct03317
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant:
Jordan B. King, Robert Evans, Joel G. Stadiem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
HENRY CALVIN JONES
Defendant:
MALINDA THOMAS, MS. GROOMS, MICHAEL L. SCARBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galarza v. Taylor
as 5:2023ct03197
Plaintiff:
Randolph Galarza
Defendant:
Thomas G. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBETT v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY CORBETT
Defendant:
ELIZABETH OLIVER, LARRY BROWN, JUDGE THOMAS LAMBERTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Trexler
as 5:2023ct03156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Teresa Lynn Trexler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dever et al
as 5:2023ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III, G. Alan DuBois, April Bun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOORE v. THOMAS
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
JACK P. MOORE
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HOPKINS THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS-BEY v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA L.P. THOMAS-BEY and ABDI KEBA-BEY
Defendant:
SHARON A. DAVIS, CURTISS MORRISS, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WOODS et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM MITCHELL
Defendant:
LEUENANT WOODS, SGT. COMITO, LEUTENANT ROUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
