Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Combs v. Palmer, et al
as 2:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kevin Combs
Defendant:
(John Doe) "Palmer, Captain (John Doe) "Norris, 1-14 John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Warren, Jr. et al
as 4:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
D.W. Warren, Jr., Deputy M. Kingsley, Deputy Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hearn et al
as 3:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Percell Williams
Defendant:
Hearn, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Jessica Lee Wilson, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Fain
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2011cv00153
Plaintiff:
Tariq A. Vaughn, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Richmond City Police Department, Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Deena Kaye Myers
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Clyde Alderman, Jerry Streat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00190
Plaintiff:
Muwakkil Seifullah Bey Shabazz
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Toney King, M. Underdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Lanteigne et al
as 1:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Julius Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Paul J. Lanteigne, Doctor John Doe, Corporal Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
