Cases 71 - 80 of 306
United States of America v. Ulysses S. Martin Jr., DDS, PC et al
as 8:2019cv01641
Defendant:
Ulysses S. Martin Jr., DDS, PC and Ulysses S. Martin, Jr.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Hotspot Tan, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01490
Defendant:
Paul Hughes, Jr., Hotspot Tan, INc. and Hotspot Tan, Inc..
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Swann et al
as 1:2019cv01099
Defendant:
Carolyn Swann, Vivian Swann, Norman Swann and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Dvorsky et al
as 1:2019cv00821
Defendant:
Comptroller of Maryland and Regis Dvorsky
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Vignola
as 1:2019cv00387
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Defendant:
Paul J. Vignola, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Moschonas
as 1:2019cv00332
Defendant:
PATRICIA MOSCHONAS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702
United States of America v. Thomas Sellman, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03257
Defendant:
Jannell Sellman, Thomas Sellman, Inc., Thomas Sellman and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Washington Davis v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv02852
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Washington Davis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6694
United States of America v. Weiss et al
as 8:2018cv02748
Defendant:
Brett Weiss and Chung & Press LLP
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6672 IRS: Failure to Collect and Pay Over Tax, or Attempt to Evade or Defeat Tax
United States of America v. Clark
as 8:2018cv02742
Defendant:
Richard E. Clark
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
