Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Betty Faye Brown Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campos et al v. Headlights, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Alana Campos, Ina Schnitzer, Alana Marie Souza and others
Defendant:
Headlights, Inc. doing business as Headlights Go-Go, Mermaids, Inc. doing business as Headlights OBX and Robert L. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Brown v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Joshua Omar Brown
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, The General Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
Prince Parker & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00470
Respondent:
Jenny Brown
Petitioner:
Prince Parker & Associates, Inc.
BROWN-WELLS v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
as 1:2019cv00627
Plaintiff:
Denise Brown-Wells
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Superior Court of Wake County et al
as 4:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Superior Court of Wake County, R. Allen Baddour and State of North Carolina
Plaintiff:
Calvin Earl Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Frost-Arnett Company
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kendall Brown
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell v. USHBB, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
USHBB, Inc., James A. Moore, Oscar H. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BROWN
as 1:2015cv00135
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. BROWN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
