Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Rongsuwan et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv01246
Plaintiff: Pasakorn Rongsuwan and Phensitang Pookham
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Kimberly Zanotti and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Wu et al v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv00467
Defendant: Gregory Collett, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services
Plaintiff: Minjiong Wu and Jin Ying
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Bhardwaj et al v. Wolf et al
as 8:2019cv03655
Plaintiff: Akshay Bhardwaj and Chelsea Nichole Bhardwaj
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Emmanuel Asamoah v. Janet Napolitano
as 11-1031
Plaintiff - Appellant: EMMANUEL ASAMOAH and CHRISTINA FINES
Defendant - Appellee: JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the DHS, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and RICHARD CATERISANO, Service Chief, Baltimore USCIS District Office Department of Homeland Security
Aguiao v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 8:2009cv02867
Plaintiff: Cesar Luiz Aguiao
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Type: Other Statutes None
Bah v. Keisler et al
as 8:2007cv02822
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Bah
Defendant: Peter D. Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Rahim v. Collett et al
as 8:2007cv00673
Plaintiff: Sawsan Abdul Rahim
Defendant: Gregory Collett, Emilio T. Gonzalez and U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?