Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Hankins v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Steve Herrick, Brian J. Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Bowen Hankins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. John Warren
as 16-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGINIA URANIUM, INC., COLES HILL, LLC, BOWEN MINERALS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY MCAULIFFE, in his official capacity as Governor of Virginia, MAURICE JONES, in his official capacity as Virginia Secretary of Commerce and Trade, CONRAD SPANGLER, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy and others
:
and
Virginia Uranium, Inc. et al v. McAuliffe et al
as 4:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Virginia Uranium, Inc., Coles Hill, LLC, Bowen Minerals, LLC and others
Defendant:
Terry McAuliffe, Maurice Jones, Conrad Spangler and others
Amicus Curiae:
Roanoke River Basin Association and Dan River Basin Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City of Annapolis v. Bowen, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis
Defendant:
Edgar A Bowen, Jr., Kenneth S Ashton, Gene Craig Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
