Contract Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Delta-T Corporation v. Harris Thermal Transfer Products, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00321
Plaintiff: Delta-T Corporation and Delta-T Corporation
Defendant: Harris Thermal Transfer Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
CLAY et al v. C T CORPORATION SYSTEM We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00925
Plaintiff: PERCY LEE CLAY and DIANE CLAY
Defendant: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Delta-T Corporation v. Pacific Ethanol, Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00524
Plaintiff: Delta-T Corporation
Defendant: Pacific Ethanol, Incorporated, Pacific Ethanol Stockton, LLC, Pacific Ethanol Imperial, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Eaton Electrical Inc. v. Delta-T Corporation
as 4:2008cv00080
Plaintiff: Eaton Electrical Inc., Eaton Electrical Inc. and Eaton Electrical Inc.
Defendant: Delta-T Corporation and Delta-T Corporation
ThirdParty Defendant: Gemma Power Systems, LLC
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Delta-T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Both
AT&T Corporation v. First Washington Mortgage Bankers, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01303
Plaintiff: AT&T Corporation
Defendant: First Washington Mortgage Bankers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0203 Telecommunications Collection of Charges
Willis v. AT&T Corporation
as 2:2007cv00410
Plaintiff: Robert Willis
Defendant: AT&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
AT&T Corporation v. Qualyst, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00132
Plaintiff: AT&T Corporation
Defendant: Qualyst, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?