Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Maid to Perfection Global, Inc. v. Mary Beth Ensor et al
as 1:2009cv00958
Plaintiff:
Maid to Perfection Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Mary Beth Ensor, Patricia L. Giese and Maid In The U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Canon U.S.A., Inc. v. Fontenelle
as 5:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Sylvester Fontenelle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maid to Perfection Corp. v. Alderman et al
as 8:2008cv03342
Plaintiff:
Maid to Perfection Corp.
Defendant:
Kathryn F. Alderman, Daniel J. Alderman, KD IND LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Innovation U.S.A., Inc. v. Lifestyle Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00303
Plaintiff:
Innovation U.S.A., Inc. and Innovation U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Lifestyle Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
180s, Inc. et al v Gordini U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
180s, Inc. and 180s, LLC
Defendant:
Gordini U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Stertil B.V. et al v. Automotive Lifts & Machinery Corp.
as 1:2007cv02411
Plaintiff:
Stertil B.V., Stertil B.V., Stertil-Koni U.S.A., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Automotive Lifts & Machinery Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al v. SMITH
as 3:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC
Defendant:
JUDY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al v. SMITH
as 1:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron Intellectual Property LLC
Defendant:
Judy Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al v. Stocks, et al.,
as 2:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron Intellectual Property LLC
Defendant:
Stocks, Angela, Stocks, Roy Alton Jr. and North East Oil Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
