Cases 51 - 60 of 138
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01422
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01404
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01348
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Curatola v. Dekel
as 9:2022cv03967
Plaintiff:
Gerald P Curatola d/b/a Rejuvenation Dentistry, Rejuvenation Health, and Rejuvenation Health Optimal Nutrition
Defendant:
Dr. Moshe Dekel d/b/a Rejuvenate Health and Optimal Health and Wellness, LLC d/b/a Rejuvenate Health, Optimal Health and Wellnes, LLC d/b/a Rejuvenate Health, Dr. Bradley C. Morris d/b/a Rejuvenate Health and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01254
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01118
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
