Cases 71 - 80 of 3,020
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 8:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.255.228.246 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 173.64.111.177 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 69.250.66.5 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.86.201.13 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
