Cases 111 - 120 of 454
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WISEMAN
as 1:2016mc00018
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JEFFREY J. WISEMAN
Pendleton v. Reid et al
as 5:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Curtis Pendleton
Defendant:
Robert L. Reid , Scott B. Kauffman , Jerry R. Licari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VanHook vs North American Roofing Services, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. VanHook, Jr.
Defendant:
North American Roofing Services, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
North American Roofing Services, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Thomas J. VanHook, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. BLACKWOOD
as 1:2016mc00004
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
L. J. BLACKWOOD, II
Gulyas v. Appalachian State University et al
as 5:2016cv00028
Defendant:
Appalachian State University , University of North Carolina , Cindy A. Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gulyas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jemsek v. North Carolina Medical Board et al
as 5:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jemsek
Defendant:
North Carolina Medical Board , Janelle R Rhyne , Robert Moffatt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jemsek v. North Carolina Medical Board et al
as 4:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jemsek
Defendant:
North Carolina Medical Board, Janelle R Rhyne, Robert Moffatt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Willis v. Henderson et al
as 4:2016mc00002
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Willis
Defendant:
Christopher C. Henderson, Town of Trenton, Sylvia A. Willis and others
Willis v. Town of Trenton, North Carolina et al
as 4:2016mc00001
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Willis
Respondent:
Town of Trenton, North Carolina, Dal Wooten, Carol M. Hood and others
Collier, et al. v. Dyson, Jr.
as 5:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Collier , June Collier , Kenneth McBride, Executor and others
Defendant:
Hugh M. Dyson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
