Cases 11 - 20 of 1,030
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
LIBRE IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC.
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Donna Conner v. Xfinity
as 24-1145
Plaintiff:
DONNA MARIE CONNER
Defendant:
XFINITY, United States General, ASSURANCE WIRELESS USA-LP, JASON S. MIYARES, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General and others
US v. Mark Haines
as 24-6099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK DANIEL HAINES
Gutierrez Solorzano v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Gutierrez Solorzano
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Daniel M. Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
US v. Mark James
as 24-6031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY JAMES, a/k/a Shoffer, a/k/a Shoff Dog
FX Aviation Capital LLC v. Hector Guerrero
as 24-1027
Plaintiff:
FX AVIATION CAPITAL LLC
Defendant:
HECTOR GUERRERO, MARK LIKER, ANATOLY GALUNOV and others
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-302
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Petitioner:
ACCENTURE LLP
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-299
Petitioner:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
