Cases 11 - 16 of 16
National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States Department Of Defense et al
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, Thomas B. Modly, Dr. Mark T. Esper and others
Plaintiff:
National Veterans Legal Services Program
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Jimmy Roberts v. Frank Perry
as 19-6197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY ALLEN ROBERTS
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Director, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Department of Adult Correction (Official Capacity) and FRANK L. PERRY, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Department of Adult Correction (Official Capacity)
Chris W. Taylor v. Lee W. Bettis, Jr.
as 16-2239
Party Below - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WYATT LIVINGSTON
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS W. TAYLOR, for himself and all others similarly situated, WILLIAM G. HARRISON, SR., CATHY HORTON HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA SHERYL LUCAS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE W. BETTIS, PAT LEIGH PITTMAN, JOANNE K. PARTIN and others
Defendant:
CCDN, LLC., a Nevada limited liability company and 18 U.S.C. 1961(4) association-in-fact, LEGAL DEBT CURE, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and 18 U.S.C. 1961(4) association-in-fact, R.K. LOCK & ASSOCIATES, d/b/a CCDN, LLC., or The Credit Collections Defense Network, an Illinois sole proprietorship and 18 U.S.C. 1961(4) association-in-fact and others
Cunningham v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2016cv01109
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Gregory Charles Mitchell, Eastern Legal Services, Paul Hank and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
AES PHEAA Legal Service Division v. Eady
as 2:2015mc00014
Plaintiff:
AES PHEAA Legal Service Division
Defendant:
Tonya D. Eady
Teamsters Local Union No. 115 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. TAC Transport, LLC
as 8:2012mc00357
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local Union No. 115 Health & Welfare Fund and Teamsters Local Union Legal Services Fund
Defendant:
TAC Transport, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
