Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Antonieta Romero-Diaz v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2155
Petitioner: ANTONIETA MARTA ROMERO-DIAZ and W.A.E.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Consuelo Romero-Arevalo v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1966
Petitioner: CONSUELO MARIA ROMERO-AREVALO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Romero Quispe et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2022cv02127
Plaintiff: Juan Romero Quispe and Sarita's Restaurant
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
US v. Oscar Sorto Romero
as 22-4281
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: OSCAR ARMANDO SORTO ROMERO, a/k/a Lobo
Yasmin Romero Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1064
Petitioner: YASMIN ROMERO LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Blanca Segovia-Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2314
Petitioner: BLANCA SEGOVIA-ROMERO, BLANCA COREAS-SEGOVIA, FELICIDA COREAS-SEGOVIA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Le'Andre Earl v. Stephen Hoey
as 21-7559
Plaintiff / Appellant: LE'ANDRE EARL
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN HOEY, DO, Doctor
Defendant: CELIA HANSEN, HSA/RN, WARDEN B. H. ROMERO, F.C.I. Talladega and WARDEN BRYAN K. DOBBS, F.C.I. Williamsburg
Brigida Romero-Vasquez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2212
Petitioner: BRIGIDA ROMERO-VASQUEZ and O.E.O.R.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Norma Zavala-Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2202
Petitioner: NORMA ESTELA ZAVALA-ROMERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Israel Romero v. Allwell from Absolute Total Care
as 21-2056
Plaintiff / Appellant: ISRAEL ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee: ALLWELL FROM ABSOLUTE TOTAL CARE and THOMAS STEPHENS, Sales Representative Medicare Sales

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?