Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Charles Kable, IV v. Anas Elhady
as 20-154
Respondent:
MICHAEL EDMUND COLEMAN, MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN, JOHN DOE, No. 4 and others
Petitioner:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity and others
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable
as 20-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Holmes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
John Doe #2, through John Doe #X, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
C. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
Edwin Krell v. Kyle Braightmeyer
as 19-2448
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE TROOPER TYSON BRICE and STATE TROOPER KYLE BRAIGHTMEYER
Defendant:
OFFICER CRABTREE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Corrections Officer, Queen Anne's County Detention Center, OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Corrections Officer, Queen Anne's County Detention Center, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWIN CHARLES KRELL
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald Trump
as 19-1990
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE #4, JOHN DOE #4, JANE DOE #1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and others
Donald Trump v. Intl Refugee Assistance
as 19-350
Petitioner:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in this official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Respondent:
MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members, FAKHRI ZIAOLHAGH, EBLAL ZAKZOK and others
Matthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryant
as 19-7119
Defendant / Appellee:
M. A. KHAN, UNKNOWN DOE, #1, Nurse, NADINE J. BRYANT and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN
Kevin Herriott v. Michael Stephen
as 19-7097
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBINSON, Sergeant, in official and individual capacity, WASHINGTON, Associate Warden, in official and individual capacity, MICHAEL STEPHEN, Warden for Broad River, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN HERRIOTT
John Doe 2 v. Fairfax County School Board
as 19-1717
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 2, by and through his Father and Next Friend, John Doe 1
Defendant:
EILEEN HOPPOCK, employees of Fairfax County Public Schools sued in his or her official and individual capacity, jointly and severally, FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, NANCY KRELOFF, employees of Fairfax County Public Schools sued in his or her official and individual capacity, jointly and severally and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
John Doe 2 v. Fairfax County School Board
as 19-1702
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY KRELOFF, employees of Fairfax County Public Schools sued in his or her official and individual capacity, jointly and severally, EILEEN HOPPOCK, employees of Fairfax County Public Schools sued in his or her official and individual capacity, jointly and severally, THE FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 2, by and through his Father and Next Friend, John Doe 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
