Cases 21 - 30 of 381
Zhang v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2008cv02192
Plaintiff:
Rong Zhang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Gregory L. Collett and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Noor-Ul v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00830
Petitioner:
Latif Noor-Ul
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Jonathan Scharfen, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Atayee v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00829
Petitioner:
Nasir A. Atayee
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Jonathan Scharfen, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mohamed v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv02045
Plaintiff:
Hashim A. Mohamed
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ohanyere v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv02004
Plaintiff:
Celestine Ohanyere
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre and Gregory Collett
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AL-AHMED v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv00783
Plaintiff:
ALI AL-AHMED
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Phyllis Howard and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gyamfi v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00695
Petitioner:
Clement Gyamfi
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mohammad v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00696
Petitioner:
Alan Mohammad
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kuo v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2008cv01762
Plaintiff:
Mon Chien Kuo
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Gregory L. Collett and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Remi Njoku v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-1688
Petitioner:
REMI CHIDE NJOKU
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
