Cases 21 - 30 of 1,171
US v. Scott Williams
as 23-4595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT ANTHONY WILLIAMS
US v. Amos Scott
as 23-6880
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMOS JUNIOR SCOTT, a/k/a Crazy
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Connor v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv04360
Plaintiff:
Jay Connor
Defendant:
Scott Jones and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Leebcor Services, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 23-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEEBCOR SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, USA, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, in her official capacity, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
Capital Broadcasting Company, Incorporated v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAPITAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, MCCLATCHY COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a The News and Observer Publishing Company and JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C., d/b/a Law Offices of James Scott Farrin
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Stuhr et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2023cv03357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stuhr, Sarah Legare Stuhr, Edward Thomas Legare and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District, LTC Andrew Johannes, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
