Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Jeffrey Corporal v. Acting Assistant Warden Butler
as 21-6437
Defendant / Appellee:
CCMSII JOSEPH R. JEFCOAT, LT. SMITH, CCMS CORY M. C/O WALKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CORPORAL
Interested Party:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6009
Defendant / Appellee:
STETVEN A. JONES, Captain, SERGEANT T. H. WILLIAMSON, JANE DOE, Medical Contractor Mediko employee and others
Defendant:
MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region, COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Kiser
as 20-7807
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR MULLINS, LIEUTENANT ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PERRIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Walter Booker, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7623
Defendant / Appellee:
R. RIDDICK, Postal Assistant, GREGORY HALLOWAY, Eastern Regional Administrator, K. COSBY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER DELANEY BOOKER, JR.
Takaeus Graham v. S. Stallard
as 20-7533
Defendant / Appellee:
NATARCHA GREGG, J. COLLINS, S. COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAKAEUS MAKEON GRAHAM
Ezekiel Cox v. Dr. Nwaokoha
as 20-7358
Defendant / Appellee:
BOWELS, Assistant Warden, MR. BENJAMIN DEMPSEY, IPM, MRS. CLEMENTS, Head RN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL J. COX
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-7235
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-6628
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
