Cases 31 - 40 of 1,043
Daniel Hernandez-Cruz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1997
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Clark v. Kendall, III
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Clark
Defendant:
Frank Kendall
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sunday Egahi v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNDAY NGBEDE EGAHI
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, DANIEL M. RENAUD, Director of the USCIS Vermont Service Center and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Jaime Navaro Cerritos v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1897
Petitioner:
JAIME DANIEL NAVARO CERRITOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Connor Rushing
as 23-4537
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CONNOR DANIEL RUSHING
US v. William Daniels
as 23-6792
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM ISAAC DANIELS, a/k/a Tu Tu, a/k/a Too
Leebcor Services, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 23-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEEBCOR SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, USA, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, in her official capacity, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
VB BTS, LLC v. Jefferson County, West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
VB BTS, LLC
Defendant:
Jefferson County, West Virginia and The Jefferson County Planning Commission
Petitioner:
Corey T. Ash, Tommy Ash, Cheryl Avery and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
