Cases 31 - 40 of 344
Beatrice Rivera v. Arlington County Department of Human Services
as 22-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEATRICE RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ARLINGTON COUNTY JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURT, RUTH SELLASSIE and others
US v. Michael Young
as 22-4373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG, a/k/a Mizzle
US v. Lance Young
as 22-6744
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LANCE D. YOUNG
US v. Tyrone Young
as 22-6648
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRONE YOUNG
Speed Trans, LLC v. PAGE YY LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Chris Van Dyk Speed Trans LLC and Speed Trans, LLC
Defendant:
Kylia PAGE YY LLC, John Doe, Page YY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Maximus, Inc. v. Sharey Thomas
as 22-185
Petitioner:
MAXIMUS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
SHAREY THOMAS, JENNIFER GILVIN, LAURA VICK and others
Rivera v. Arlington County Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Rivera
Defendant:
Arlington County Department of Human Services, Theresa Young, Arlington County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
