Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Island Creek Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 13-1921
Petitioner: ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY, Beatrice Pocahontas Company
Respondent: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BETTY L. KEENE, o/b/o Cecil Keene
In re: Cecil Jackson
as 13-1144
Petitioner: In re: CECIL EDWARD JACKSON
West Virginia CWP Fund v. Celia Sharp
as 12-2101
Petitioner: WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, as carrier for Gamble Coals, Inc.
Respondent: CELIA A. SHARP, surviving spouse of Cecil R. Sharp and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Garris et al v. Nuckols et al
as 1:2012cv02416
Plaintiff: Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant: Al Nuckols, Cecil C. Stone, III, Kelli S. Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. Nuckols et al
as 1:2012cv02417
Plaintiff: Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant: Al Nuckols, Cecil C. Stone, III, Kelli S. Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Cecil Ray, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6028
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CECIL RAY, JR., a/k/a Esco
Cornforth v. Cecil Bank
as 1:2011cv03603
Plaintiff: Douglas J Cornforth
Defendant: Cecil Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Heyward Dempsey
as 11-207
Movant: In re: HEYWARD CECIL DEMPSEY
: and
Douglas Willard v. Karen Kunda We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1120
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOUGLAS E. WILLARD and DEBRA WILLARD
Plaintiff: WHITETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN KUNDA, ADAM KUNDA, HACK'S POINT GENERAL STORE, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant: WAYNE HOLMQUIST and NANCY HOLMQUIST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?