Cases 71 - 80 of 134
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION V. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
as 1:2016cv00607
Plaintiff:
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Duke University v. Danielle Seaman
as 16-181
Petitioner:
DUKE UNIVERSITY and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
DANIELLE SEAMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
:
Duke v. Perquimans County, NC et al
as 2:2016mc00001
Petitioner:
Lesley Duke
Respondent:
Perquimans County, NC and The State of North Carolina
William Smith v. Department of Labor
as 15-1713
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SMITH
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary, DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and others
SEAMAN V. DUKE UNIVERSITY, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE SEAMAN
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Michael Reeves v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1596
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUKE REEVES
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Cattaneo v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00175
Defendant:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Progress, Inc., Securitas Critical Infrastructure Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cattaneo
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, INC. et al v. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
as 1:2014cv00752
Plaintiff:
CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, INC. and WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INC.
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
YADKIN RIVERKEEPER INC. et al v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
as 1:2014cv00753
Plaintiff:
YADKIN RIVERKEEPER INC. and WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INC.
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Neuse Riverkeeper Foundation, Inc. et al v. Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
Neuse Riverkeeper Foundation, Inc. and Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc.
Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
