Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 157
In re: Jason Grant
as 17-415
Movant: In re: JASON GRANT
:
Patricia Grant-Moore v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2072
Petitioner: PATRICIA GRANT-MOORE, Beneficiary and CURTIS DEWAYNE MOORE
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Richard Rowzie v. G. Grant
as 17-1999
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD ALBERT ROWZIE
Defendant - Appellee: GURNEY WINGATE GRANT, II, Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office Richmond VA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN RUFFO
US v. Rashad Harri
as 17-4547
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RASHAD GRANT HARRIS
Parshall v. Park Sterling Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00490
Plaintiff: Paul Parshall
Defendant: Park Sterling Corporation, Leslie M. Baker, Jr., Walter C. Ayers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Roskopf v. Park Sterling Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00483
Plaintiff: Michael Roskopf
Defendant: Park Sterling Corporation, James Cherry, Leslie M. Baker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rowzie v. Grant et al
as 1:2017cv00746
Plaintiff: Richard Albert Rowzie
Defendant: G. Wingate Grant, United States of America and John Ruffo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Jerry Grant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-4402
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JERRY WAYNE GRANT
US v. Cheaser Antonio Grant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-4276
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CHEASER ANTONIO GRANT
Clark et al v. For the Issuance of Subpoenas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a)
as 1:2017mc00008
Petitioner: Grant Clark and Russell Mayhew
Respondent: For the Issuance of Subpoenas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782(a)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?