Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sudama Gibbons v. Donna Smith
as 20-6744
Petitioner / Appellant:
SUDAMA LEROY GIBBONS
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNA M. SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
Rhonda Kirschmann v. State of Virginia
as 19-2335
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT, NANCY PARR, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Chesapeake, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA KIRSCHMANN, and those similarly situated
US v. Sudama Gibbons
as 19-7021
Defendant / Appellant:
SUDAMA LEROY GIBBONS, a/k/a Sudhama Leroy Gibbons
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Denise Gibbon v. Andrew Saul
as 19-1650
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, in her official capacity of Acting Commissioner of Social Security and ANDREW SAUL, in his official capacity of Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE GIBBON
Gibbons v. The Green Law Firm, P.C.
as 2:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gibbons
Defendant:
The Green Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
