Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Min Dong Wu v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1695
Petitioner:
MIN DONG WU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Yuan v. Jaddou et al
as 8:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
Dong Yuan
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and US-CIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
US v. Jian-Yun Dong
as 22-7456
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JIAN-YUN DONG, a/k/a John Dong
Cecilia, LLC et al v. Azod et al
as 8:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
CECILIA, LLC, GOOD STUFF, LLC, James G. Robinson and others
Defendant:
Dr. Armin Azod, Dr. Dong Zhang, Dr. Ramez Elgammal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Alyse Sanchez v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 21-1001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALYSE SANCHEZ, ELMER ONAN SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ, JEAN CLAUDE EYEGHE-NANA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEO FAHEY, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DIANNE WITTE, Director, Maryland Field Office of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operation, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant:
TERRY KOKOLIS
US v. Jian-Yun Dong
as 19-4511
Defendant / Appellant:
JIAN-YUN DONG, a/k/a John Dong
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wanrong Lin v. Kristjen Nielsen
as 19-1714
Not Yet Classified:
TERRY KOKOLIS, Superintendent, Anne Arundel County Detention Facilities, KRISTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, WANRONG LIN and others
Wang v. Zanotti, et al
as 1:2019cv00726
Respondent:
Kimberly Zanotti, Kevin McAleenan and Mark Koumans
Petitioner:
Dong Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
US v. Jian-Yun Dong
as 19-4359
Defendant / Appellant:
JIAN-YUN DONG, a/k/a John Dong
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ji Yu v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2173
Petitioner:
JI DONG YU, a/k/a Tong Liu
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
