Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Jack Graham, III v. Steve Albro
as 23-2064
Petitioner / Appellant: JACK H. GRAHAM, III, d/b/a Kathye's Jewelry and Pawn Shop
Respondent / Appellee: STEVE ALBRO, Director of Industry Operations Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Robert Miller v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1604
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT MICHAEL MILLER
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, STEVEN MICHAEL DETTELBACH, Director, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Kipke et al v. Moore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01293
Plaintiff: Susannah Warner Kipke and Maryland State Rifle and Pistol Association, Inc.
Defendant: Wes Moore, Roland L. Butler, Jr. and Joshua Kurtz
Consolidated Plaintiff: Katherine Novotny, Sue Burke, Esther Rossberg and others
Consolidated Defendant: Scott D. Shellenberger, Ivan J. Bates, Col Roland L. Butler, Jr. and others
Cross Defendant: Alison M. Healey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Miller v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff: Robert M. Miller
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, Steven Dettelbach and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi A.S. v. Zenith Quest Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00066
Plaintiff: Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi A.S.
Defendant: Zenith Quest Corporation, Zenith Quest International, Inc., Zenith Firearms, Inc. and others
J. Corey Fraser v. ATF
as 21-1872
Plaintiff: TANNER HIRSCHFELD and NATALIA MARSHALL
Appellant: J. COREY FRASER and BATTLEFIELD FIREARMS
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, FIREARMS, TOBACCO & EXPLOSIVES, MARVIN RICHARDSON, Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General and others
Eric Call v. Woodrow Jones III
as 21-1334
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN FROSH, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Maryland and WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of State Police
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERIC CALL, an individual and resident of Anne Arundel County, KYLE HARRISON, an individual and resident of Calvert County, CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS and others
Dominic Bianchi v. Brian Frosh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1255
Plaintiff / Appellant: FIELD TRADERS LLC, A resident of Anne Arundel County, DOMINIC BIANCHI, an individual and resident of Baltimore County, DAVID SNOPE, an individual and resident of Baltimore County and others
Defendant / Appellee: JIM FREDERICKS, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Anne Arundel County, Maryland, R. JAY FISHER, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Baltimore County, Maryland, COL. WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of State Police of Maryland and others
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
as 20-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, CATO INSTITUTE, FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY and others
Not Yet Classified: ALAN MICHAEL MYGATT-TAUBER
Daniel Patrick v. Matthew Whitaker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1079
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS BRANDON, In his official capacity, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, In his official capacity, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, FIREARMS, TOBACCO & EXPLOSIVES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL PATRICK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?