Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
A.M.L. et al v. Wright Directions, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv01907
Plaintiff:
A.M.L., J.J.L., E.R.L. and others
Defendant:
Wright Directions, LLC, Renee Sutton, LPC, Nikki Nichols, LPC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Shani Latham
as 22-4293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHANI GWYNN LATHAM
Terrance James-Bey v. State of North Carolina
as 20-6129
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, RICHARD D. BONER, GWYNN G. RADECKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Joseph Johnson v. MD Transit Administration
as 19-1885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHNSON, MARSHALL E. GWYNN, LAMONT D. JACKSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
US v. Donte Gwynn
as 12-7088
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONTE GWYNN
US v. Donte Gwynn
as 12-7038
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONTE GWYNN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
