Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 21 Welfare Fund et al v. Harrisburg Glass LLC
as 1:2023mc00042
Plaintiff: International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 21 Welfare Fund and Joseph Ashdale
Defendant: Harrisburg Glass LLC
Garnishee: Primis Bank
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace v. SPX Corporation
as 21-1295
Plaintiff: CARL VAN LOON, DAVID BRASS, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons, DAVID BABCOCK, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: SPX CORPORATION
David Brass v. SPX Corporation
as 21-1240
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD HAMILTON, RON BEEGLE, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons, CHARLES KOZITZKY and others
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, JOSEPH DI BIASE, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons and JOHN PRODORUTTI, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons
Defendant / Appellee: SPX CORPORATION
Mack Trucks, Incorporated v. Intl Union, UAW
as 20-2054
Defendant / Appellee: UAW LOCAL NO. 2301, UAW LOCAL NO. 171 and INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW
Plaintiff / Appellant: MACK TRUCKS, INCORPORATED
Merck & Co., Inc. v. FWK Holdings, LLC
as 20-432
Respondent: THE RETIRED FIREFIGHTERS' SECURITY BENEFIT FUND OF THE UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 49 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, WALGREEN CO. and others
Petitioner: SCHERING CORPORATION, SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: ZETIA (EZETIMIBE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Constellium Rolled Products v. United Steel, Paper and Forest We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1759
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL & SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION AFL-CIO/CLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: CONSTELLIUM ROLLED PRODUCTS-RAVENSWOOD, LLC
Volvo Group North America, LLC v. UAW
as 20-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant: VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: UAW LOCAL NO. 2069 and INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW
Ohio Valley Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America
as 19-2092
Plaintiff / Appellee: OHIO VALLEY COAL COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, DISTRICT 31 and UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Monongalia County Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America
as 19-2104
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL UNION and UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION 1702
Plaintiff / Appellee: MONONGALIA COUNTY COAL COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?