Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Alyse Sanchez v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 24-1487
Plaintiff:
ALYSE SANCHEZ, ELMER ONAN SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ, AMIRA ABBAS ABDALLA and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, PATRICK J. LECHLEITNER, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and MATTHEW ELLISTON, Acting Director, Maryland Field Office of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations
US v. Eddie Rodriguez-Pinto
as 24-6503
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDDIE SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ-PINTO
Elias Mejia Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1329
Petitioner:
ELIAS ISMAEL MEJIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Nowlin et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Carmin Nowlin, Tamika Haley and Jesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Israel Veliz-Saenz v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner:
ISRAEL VALENTIN VELIZ-SAENZ, ANA RUBI LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, DALIA MARGARITA VELIZ-LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jose Soloman-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1236
Petitioner:
JOSE SOLOMAN-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney general
Lopez-Marti et al v. Geico Insurance Company et al
as 8:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
Suljeily Lopez-Marti and Sylvia Nieves-Pepin
Defendant:
Geico Insurance Company, Jonathan Elias-Rodriguez, John Doe and others
Myers et al v. National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
Angela Myers, Oscar Rodriguez, Paul Sutton and others
Defendant:
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. and NASCAR Digital Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jose Rodriguez-Amaya v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2052
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ-AMAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Prudencio Rodriguez
as 23-7004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PRUDENCIO RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
