Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. Kenneth Reams
as 22-6957
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH LAMONT REAMS, a/k/a HOT
US v. Corry Reams
as 20-4502
Defendant / Appellant:
CORRY RONDEL REAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Kenneth Reams
as 20-7284
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH LAMONT REAMS, a/k/a HOT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Sgt. Adcock
as 20-6156
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O MORGAN, C/O WILLIAMS, CAPT. WILSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY
Patchan v. Engility Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01384
Defendant:
Darryll J. Pines, Katharina McFarland, David A. Savner and others
Plaintiff:
John Patchan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CSX Transportation Inc v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
as 3:2016cv03208
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Revenue and Rick Reames, III
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. South Carolina Dept of Revenue
as 16-1726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and RICK REAMES, III, Agency Director of the South Carolina Department of Revenue
US v. Kenneth Ream
as 16-4354
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH LAMONT REAMS
CSX Transportation Inc v. South Carolina Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2015cv04625
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Revenue and Rick Reames, III
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
CSX Transportation Inc v. South Carolina Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2014cv03821
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Revenue and Rick Reames, III
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503 Railroad Revitalization Regulatory Reform
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
